I went despite the fact that I haven't felt as if the Coen Brothers have made a good film since Oh Brother Where Art Tho?, a film that some may or may not agree with me on being good. I though it was a pretty funny retelling of the Odyssey, but I can see how it might piss some folk off. Either way, the Big Lebowksi is one of my favourite films, and I felt that the Coen Brothers with Bridges again might overcome what I've come to characterise as bland, tensionless film making on the part of the brothers. I can honestly say it has been years since I've felt engaged by a Coen Brothers film, and not even the Cormac McCarthy inspired No Country for Old Men could dissuade me of this belief.
And, truthfully, neither did True Grit.
A remake of a not terribly good John Wayne film, True Grit has only the performance of Bridges and his young co-star, Hailee Steinfeld to fully recommend it, and even then, I would have to admit that in the case of Bridges, he has done better (Steinfeld I don't know about, but I will say this: she looks a lot more Asian in images outside the film, a fact I discovered by opening the IMDb to check the spelling of her name). Yet, Bridges is engaging in his reprisal of the Wayne role of Rooster Gogburn, the tough, drunken, morally dubious US Marshal who is hired by the young daughter of a murdered man. That the story that unfolds fails to engage the viewer in any real way, or offer any concept of tension, isn't his fault, but that of the Coen Brothers, who appear to have mislaid any ability they had to create a scene that fully envelopes the viewer and subjects them to the experience that the characters are having in the film. I'm not quite sure why this is, mind you, since to all extents and purposes, the pair understand film making to a competent degree, with the look of the film and the music being fairly seamless in maintaining the authenticity of the time the film is set. I suspect that it in part rises from the fact that they don't ever put their characters in positions where they can be threatened, or where the audience believes that a terrible thing can happen. In fact, you might argue that they actively seek to not immerse their audience, for despite Mattie's attack by the snake at the end, there's never any credible sense in the film that she could die, or that she will suffer terribly, since you never see what happens with the doctor and her treatment.
That said, I didn't dislike the film. I had a decent time in it, in part because I do have a soft spot for Bridges, and because there's nothing bad about how it is made. Rather, it is the question of choice that the Coen Brothers have made to what to show and what not to, and how to convey the threat and tension of their film.