Ben Peek (benpeek) wrote,
Ben Peek
benpeek

Panels

There's a bit of a discussion going on about panels. If you've not ever been to one, a panel is basically where four or five authors/experts sit round and discussion a topic, while taking comments from the audience. Joe Scalzi has his take on how to keep a panel interesting, which is with the fist and wild_irises suggests the open palm. However, the most interesting take I think belongs to nihilistic_kid who says "it only works on the basis of [you] not having a personal stake in the discussion."

I am not, by any means, an expert on panels. I don't really like panels from an audience member standpoint, since I find that most artists/whatever are simply performing in safe mode, where they work hard at being audience friendly and family safe and keep their opinions to themselves (and in my limited experience of panelists who aren't like that, they're so full of shit and stupidity that you just want to crawl into the bar). However, in my experience of being on panels, which I don't mind from a performance point of view, the panels that have been absolute ratshit are the ones where the moderator had a stake in what was being said. Where the moderator, ultimately, became a member of the panel.

So I reckon the third opinion is pretty solid.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 4 comments