?

Log in

No account? Create an account

June 30th, 2005

The Once & Future King

There was dead silence.

Only, in the far corner of the room, which had been netted off for Cully--loose there, unhooded and deep in moult--they could hear a faint muttering from the choleric infantry colonel. "Damn niggers," he was mumbling. "Damned administration. Damned politicians. Damned bolsheviks. Is this a damned dagger I see before me, the handle toward my hand? Damned spot. Now, Cully, hast thou but one brief hour to live, and then thou must be damned perpetually."

"Colonel," said the peregrine coldly, "not before the younger officers."

"I beg your pardon, Mam," said the poor colonel at once. "It is something that gets into my head, you know. Some deep damnation."

There was silence again, formal, terrible and calm.


Would you believe, I have never read T. H. White's the Once and Future King?

It's true. In my slow, researching way, I have begun patching my fantasy background together for my next large project (or so it appears). I settled on it around the time I began thinking about sword and sorcery and its nature and, since years in the University systems has left me with the disease of research, and because it'll be at least eight or nine months before I can seriously sit down to it, I figured I'd begin slowly reading. I read Mallory's Le Morte de Arthur a few years back, and found it a mixed experience of suffering and odd moments of interest, but White's series completely slipped past me. I'm not all that big on Arthurian text anyway, since I tend to think that there's a little bit too much of it floating around.*

However, White's book is really beautiful (and quite funny, though this will apparently change as I get to the end). I haven't read the whole thing yet, so I'll refrain from saying anything that might look like a critique, except that I've been surprised by how much I've gotten into it being the jaded fantasy reader I am, and how, as I continue reading, the book feels like the foundation of modern day fantasy much more than Tolkien. The final edition of The Once & Future King was published a few years after Tolkien**, but the original books were published some fifteen to twenty years prior (The Sword In The Stone was published when what was thirty two, in 1938). I'm not up on my Tolkien knowledge, because I dislike Tolkien quite a bit, so I've no idea if there was a sequence of influence there, but White's book can be felt, I think, in the heroic fantasy genre that populates around us. The poor orphan boy Wart who becomes Arthur, is what would later be known as The Farm Boy Who Would Be King, and can be found in countless novels, complete with his wizard mentor showing him how to be a good king. David Eddings Belgarid series springs straight to mind, but there are more. And there is also the bumbling wizard, Meryln, and his uppity owl, because bumbling wizards often have an uppity animal to help them out, I've noticed.

There is no doubt that Tolkien has been hugely influential on the fantasy genre, but as I continue reading, I'm surprised that more people don't also talk about The Once & Future King.




* In other words, any new book/film/musical claiming to be the legend of King Arthur makes me break out the gasonline cans.

** A fifth book, the Book of Meryln was published after White's death in 1977 (though White died in 1964). For those, like me, who are fascinated by how authors die, White died on about the ship Piraeus, while returning from America. Kind of fitting, I feel.

Observation #6019.

There's a lot of anti-scientology writing around of late. I can't surf five clicks without finding someone who wants to save Katie Holmes and talk about how scientology is built upon lies. Personally, I blame Tom Cruise. However, I am saying, as of this moment, that if you have to say these things, if you have to get up and talk about how stupid and wrong and how scientology is raping your mind... then you also have to take a few moments out discuss the idea of there existing anything rational in any religion that you can us as a comparison. Be interesting. Ranting against scientology is an ability kindergarten children have. As far as I'm concerned, all religions are filled with stupidity, and all religions simultaneously lie and benefit depending on the person, and all have nice bank accounts and people who want to help you and punish you and occasionally they're the same person... and this doesn't change if you're talking about the religion that has reincarnated aliens or if it has the immaculately conceived baby who rose from the dead and told people that Dad sent the angels to down to burn the heathens.

They're all fucked up, baby, and I wouldn't take money or candy from any of them.